Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
       Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
       Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
       Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
       Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
       "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
       Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon
In-Reply-To: <E1KRmxa-0001S5-E0@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808090902100.24140@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References: <aYipy-5FM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYiIP-6bN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYkAT-15Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYDX5-fa-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYE6H-tg-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYEgj-Fc-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYEJq-1xB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYET8-1L7-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
 <aYFcq-2f2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYFvP-2Vc-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYJIZ-15G-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYKvs-2gQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <aYKF1-2qs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1KRmxa-0001S5-E0@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 966
Lines: 28


On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Bodo Eggert wrote:

> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:
> 
> >> > I'm stubborn, I want to get it right _and_ keep it fast.
> >> 
> >> For me it would seem better to just not use two part 5 byte nops
> >> instead of adding such hacks.  I doubt there are that many of them
> >> anyways. I bet you won't be able to measure any difference between the
> >> different nop types in any macro benchmark.
> > 
> > I wish we had a true 5 byte nop. The alternative is a jmp 0, which is
> > measurable.
> 
> Did you try short jumps? (0xeb 0x03 0x?? 0x?? 0x??)

What would those last three bytes be?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/