Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754497AbYHIPdv (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:33:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753277AbYHIPdl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:33:41 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:46966 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752923AbYHIPdk (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:33:40 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: PeUPHPTi5UusvS6XoUWTZkPUrSfu3PWSDNgIi0RSK67A 1218296018 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] autofs4 - add miscelaneous device for ioctls From: Ian Kent To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , autofs mailing list , Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel In-Reply-To: <20080809125953.GB16308@infradead.org> References: <20080807114002.4142.30417.stgit@web.messagingengine.com> <20080807114030.4142.76568.stgit@web.messagingengine.com> <20080809125953.GB16308@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:29:09 +0800 Message-Id: <1218295750.2994.61.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1528 Lines: 33 On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 08:59 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:40:31PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > The actual problem with autofs is that it can't reconnect to existing > > mounts. Immediately one things of just adding the ability to remount > > autofs file systems would solve it, but alas, that can't work. This is > > because autofs direct mounts and the implementation of "on demand mount > > and expire" of nested mount trees have the file system mounted on top of > > the mount trigger dentry. > > So what you really need instead of all the ioctl cruft is to get access > to the sb of the hidden autofs4 mount. One way to do that that I can > think of right now is to change from using get_sb_nodev as ->get_sb > to a variant that can find an existing superblock using some mount > options. I wished I'd spoken to you about this a long time ago since you seem to know how I can do this using a remount option but this isn't enough of an explanation of how it can be done. AFAICT, mount(8) will never be able to get a "struct path" or "struct nameidata" to a mount point that is covered using the path lookup in fs/namespace.c:do_*_mount() so we'll never be called back via any VFS methods. So tell me more about how this could work please! Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/