Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754829AbYHKAF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:05:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752733AbYHKAFs (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:05:48 -0400 Received: from colo.lackof.org ([198.49.126.79]:52496 "EHLO colo.lackof.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752684AbYHKAFr (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:05:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:05:35 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Bdale Garbee , Grant Grundler , Adrian Bunk , kyle@mcmartin.ca, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] binfmt_som.c: add MODULE_LICENSE Message-ID: <20080811000535.GB14163@colo.lackof.org> References: <20080806211155.GV1702@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080810005511.GB2617@colo.lackof.org> <20080810010005.GL8618@parisc-linux.org> <1218375714.18157.56.camel@rover.gag.com> <20080810151433.GO8618@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080810151433.GO8618@parisc-linux.org> X-Home-Page: http://www.parisc-linux.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2206 Lines: 61 On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:14:33AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: ... > > If that is indeed the timing, I agree. If not, let me know, and I'll > > see if I can push the right buttons in HP. > > http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/obsolete/linux-2.2/fs/binfmt_som.c?rev=1.8&view=log > > indicates I first committed the file in June 1999 and was the majority > committer to this file (prumpf also committed some code). My last > commit to it was in November 1999 (while I still worked for Genedata). Ok - I didn't realize that. > At some point around then, we moved to the 2.4 CVS tree: > > http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/linux-2.4/fs/binfmt_som.c?rev=1.21&view=log > > and there are some commits from other people at HP and myself while at > Linuxcare and HP. Thanks for digging this up. I expect it should be easy for Bdale to get this rubber stamped by any one of the HP linux kernel engineers. HP legal shouldn't need to be involved. > > The 2.5 development tree: > http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/linux-2.5/fs/binfmt_som.c?rev=1.3&view=log > > doesn't show anything of great interest. > > and the 2.6 tree represents accurately how much effort we put into SOM: > http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_som.c?rev=1.8&view=log > > > So while HP has a legitimate claim to some parts of the file, my initial > contributions before I worked for Linuxcare or HP were the largest and I > don't think that anyone has a legitimate claim that this is not a > derived work of GPL code, and hence I think Adrian's patch should be > accepted. I agree and apologize for my bad memory and lazy attitude. I didn't mean to make a big deal of this - just assumed HP was the right party to address this to. cheers, grant > > -- > Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine > "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this > operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such > a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/