Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751330AbYHKEpB (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:45:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750725AbYHKEow (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:44:52 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224]:30370 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707AbYHKEov (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:44:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=mRHTx3rqtthxcNPS0wKkunU6ukHph4VqNc2SjjDo7qkeWpWs4j3mZrTdBnMBgfMFge klZltQb8qmu1kFe+oc2I4M1piEQSot4BCC27LAPsAE4Sg/IaIdhUEq7zRSy4CZjkGAg0 NQCm64ih39jYwvDIt4ejI2CTy+Pj8Sn/7ueeI= Message-ID: <514e099a0808102144n241c8e9ak255bded0a80744f1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:44:50 -0700 From: "S K" To: "Zhao Yakui" Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300 Cc: "Thomas Renninger" , "Alan Jenkins" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1218418431.6671.52.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <514e099a0808030300u140a0ae7m92a2e7294f39f7b7@mail.gmail.com> <200808081430.43012.trenn@suse.de> <200808092059.47863.trenn@suse.de> <514e099a0808100128u303207clcb22292db2f0cc59@mail.gmail.com> <1218418431.6671.52.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1207 Lines: 29 >> So I'm guessing this is a kernel bug. > >From the attached acpidump it seems that there is no definition of > _PCT,_PSS, _PPC. So acpi_cpufreq driver can't be used on your machine. > This is a BIOS issue. Yakui, Did you actually check if the above was true? > > But it is very strange that cpufreq scaling can work on Windows XP. > Will you please try the P4 clock cpufreq driver and see whether the > scaling can work ? In fact P4 clock cpufreq driver is already replaced > by acpi_cpufreq driver for the latest cpu. > Anyway please try p4 clock cpufreq driver. What is the name of the driver? I'm not able to find any such driver in Fedora 9 installed modules. There is only acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8. Also, If someone doesn't mind, can they tell me what all files I need to replace in Fedora 9 once I get a kernel.org kernel compiled? I know how to edit grub.conf, and that I should replace vmlinuz, but do I need to replace initrd too? Thanks, SK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/