Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:08:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, jeremy@goop.org, hugh@veritas.com,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep
Message-ID: <20080811100807.GA8184@elte.hu>
References: <20080804130317.994042639@chello.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080804130317.994042639@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 909
Lines: 23


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This series is my pending lockdep queue, it includes David's graph 
> optimization, my new scheduler runqueue annotation amongst others.
> 
> The part that makes this RFC are the latter few patches that add the 
> "lock protection locks" thing Linus proposed a few days ago. I've not 
> yet written a test case that actively tests this functionality, but 
> wanted to get this out so that Jeremy can see if it works for him.

update: i'm now back from vacation and i've added these patches to 
tip/core/locking, but -tip testing found a few problems with them so i 
wont push them upstream yet.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/