Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752671AbYHKLii (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:38:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751533AbYHKLi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:38:29 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:54090 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751419AbYHKLi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:38:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pbGNNhGJCvUky0hXau/TBYlIPWhkHzTyj0oQwyQhLhUcTyISnYxZe7xZoTLpAIYr0J 3ZAtDRJRi2ElyLHNQE0kIiHENTmT94l/I0Ph7ou0Ov64qmKQ2YT4o3Hh+P2bO8m3g5DF 3n4Sk/NhZk0xsabqbKFaNKO+SnRiTvszK6yvo= Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:38:48 +0400 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: S K , Zhao Yakui , Thomas Renninger , Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300 Message-ID: <20080811113848.GA8382@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <514e099a0808030300u140a0ae7m92a2e7294f39f7b7@mail.gmail.com> <200808081430.43012.trenn@suse.de> <200808092059.47863.trenn@suse.de> <514e099a0808100128u303207clcb22292db2f0cc59@mail.gmail.com> <1218418431.6671.52.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> <514e099a0808102144n241c8e9ak255bded0a80744f1@mail.gmail.com> <20080811042244.469f8e1d@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080811042244.469f8e1d@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1143 Lines: 27 On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:22:44AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:44:50 -0700 > "S K" wrote: > > > But it is very strange that cpufreq scaling can work on Windows XP. > > > Will you please try the P4 clock cpufreq driver and see whether the > > > scaling can work ? In fact P4 clock cpufreq driver is already > > > replaced by acpi_cpufreq driver for the latest cpu. > > > Anyway please try p4 clock cpufreq driver. > > > > What is the name of the driver? I'm not able to find any such driver > > in Fedora 9 installed modules. There is only acpi-cpufreq and > > powernow-k8. > > > > yeah don't bother with p4-clockmod, it's not something that saves you > energy... it only gives you a fake feeling that you would. Why it is still in tree? It's likely that you'll waste more time explaining everybody to not use p4-clockmod than send a patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/