Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbYHKOD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:03:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751835AbYHKODt (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:03:49 -0400 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]:36288 "EHLO smtp4.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751700AbYHKODs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:03:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:02:06 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: S K , Zhao Yakui , Thomas Renninger , Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300 Message-ID: <20080811140206.GB3338@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <514e099a0808030300u140a0ae7m92a2e7294f39f7b7@mail.gmail.com> <200808081430.43012.trenn@suse.de> <200808092059.47863.trenn@suse.de> <514e099a0808100128u303207clcb22292db2f0cc59@mail.gmail.com> <1218418431.6671.52.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> <514e099a0808102144n241c8e9ak255bded0a80744f1@mail.gmail.com> <20080811042244.469f8e1d@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080811042244.469f8e1d@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1577 Lines: 41 On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:22:44AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:44:50 -0700 > "S K" wrote: > > > > But it is very strange that cpufreq scaling can work on Windows XP. > > > Will you please try the P4 clock cpufreq driver and see whether the > > > scaling can work ? In fact P4 clock cpufreq driver is already > > > replaced by acpi_cpufreq driver for the latest cpu. > > > Anyway please try p4 clock cpufreq driver. > > > > What is the name of the driver? I'm not able to find any such driver > > in Fedora 9 installed modules. There is only acpi-cpufreq and > > powernow-k8. > > yeah don't bother with p4-clockmod, it's not something that saves you > energy... it only gives you a fake feeling that you would. This statement is only true for HPC environments and when you measure Watts per work done. But if you have some desktop or server with a load that is determined by when it gets used, then p4-clockmod can actually save energy when the computer is not under high load or even idle. Or do I miss anything? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/