Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755294AbYHKQtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:49:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751835AbYHKQtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:49:41 -0400 Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99]:51693 "EHLO sssup.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbYHKQtk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:49:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasks and groups From: Dario Faggioli To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1218472252.10800.107.camel@twins> References: <1218462574.6450.24.camel@Palanthas> <48A0487B.7080600@redhat.com> <1218464753.10800.92.camel@twins> <1218471794.6450.87.camel@Palanthas> <1218472252.10800.107.camel@twins> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-u/RMhKKrvavvHYRDOpj2" Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:49:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1218473373.6450.108.camel@Palanthas> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2184 Lines: 63 --=-u/RMhKKrvavvHYRDOpj2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 18:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 18:23 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > My suggestion would be to create struct sched_param2 with plenty of > > > padding to support future expansion and add > > > sys_sched_setscheduler2()/sys_sched_getscheduler2() to deal with this > > > new structure. > > And we will miss POSIX compliance. :-( > > Anyway, I agree the ABI issue this could raise are serious enough and, = I > > repeat, I can't see any other solution too. >=20 > Well, a new version of glibc could use those to implement the posix > interface.=20 I see. Actually, you're more than right! I have not thought at it in those terms... > Because as I understand it, glibc can break ABI on certain > version bumps. Seems better to me too... I confirm I'll do the interface change as soon as possible. Thanks again, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere, DragonLance Chronicles -Dragons of Spring Drawning-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli GNU/Linux Registered User: #340657 Web: http://www.linux.it/~raistlin Blog: http://blog.linux.it/raistlin SIP Account: dario.faggioli@sipproxy.wengo.fr or raistlin@ekiga.net Jabber Account: dario.faggioli@jabber.org/WengoPhone GnuPG Key ID: 4DC83AC4 GnuPG Key Fingerprint: 2A78 AD5D B9CF A082 0836 08AD 9385 DA04 4DC8 3AC4 --=-u/RMhKKrvavvHYRDOpj2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIoG2dk4XaBE3IOsQRAtmFAJ49C/Os3kTR7QdW1CsN9D9K/dUJ0ACghH1O 47HNZoOViRPcHy+Uwqt9Y+Y= =EiZz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u/RMhKKrvavvHYRDOpj2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/