Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755198AbYHKSxb (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:53:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752302AbYHKSxV (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:53:21 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:17388 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752093AbYHKSxU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:53:20 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,189,1217833200"; d="scan'208";a="32447168" Message-ID: <48A08A11.8040507@intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:50:57 -0700 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lkml Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 References: <48A086B6.2000901@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <48A086B6.2000901@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2008 18:53:18.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[84FC62E0:01C8FBE3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 29 Christoph Lameter wrote: > It seems that the network stack becomes slower over time? Here is a list of > tbench results with various kernel versions: > > 2.6.22 3207.77 mb/sec > 2.6.24 3185.66 > 2.6.25 2848.83 > 2.6.26 2706.09 > 2.6.27(rc2) 2571.03 > > And linux-next is: > > 2.6.28(l-next) 2568.74 > > It shows that there is still have work to be done on linux-next. Too close to > upstream in performance. > > Note the KT event between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25. Why is that? is this with SLAB or with SLUB? SLUB has been known to impact network performance... Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/