Subject: checkpoint/restart ABI
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
       containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200808111853.13854.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20080807224033.FFB3A2C1@kernel>
	 <200808090013.41999.arnd@arndb.de> <20080811152201.GB25930@us.ibm.com>
	 <200808111853.13854.arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:48:34 -0700
Message-Id: <1218484114.5598.43.camel@nimitz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 702
Lines: 19

Arnd, Jeremy and Oren,

Thanks for all of the very interesting comments about the ABI.  

Considering that we're still *really* early in getting this concept
merged up into mainline, what do you all think we should do now?

My main goal here is just to get everyone to understand the approach
that we're proposing rather than to really fix the interfaces in stone.
I bet we're going to be changing them a lot before these patches
actually get in.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/