From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, swise@opengridcomputing.com, divy@chelsio.com,
       kxie@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com,
       michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, daisyc@us.ibm.com, wenxiong@us.ibm.com,
       bhua@us.ibm.com, dm@chelsio.com, leedom@chelsio.com,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator
References: <adazlnlzc60.fsf@cisco.com>
	<20080809.224637.69833549.davem@davemloft.net>
	<adafxpbzga0.fsf@cisco.com>
	<20080811.140838.202229941.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:39:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20080811.140838.202229941.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's
	message of "Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:08:38 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <adahc9rxmcc.fsf@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 573
Lines: 15

 > > Yes, that's the question -- are stateless offloads (plus CRC32C in the
 > > CPU etc) going to give good enough performance that the whole TCP
 > > offload exercise is pointless?
 > 
 > This is by definition true, over time.  And this has stedfastly proven
 > itself, over and over again.

By the definition of what?

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/