Message-ID: <48A0B571.7010903@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:56:01 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080626)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: cl@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
References: <48A086B6.2000901@linux-foundation.org>	<20080811.141501.01468546.davem@davemloft.net>	<48A0B037.501@linux-foundation.org> <20080811.145047.105665450.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080811.145047.105665450.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 693
Lines: 19

David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:33:43 -0500
> 
>> Maybe what we are seeing is general bloat in kernel execution paths
>> due to the growth in complexity?
> 
> It could be, and any kind of analysis into this would be great.

perhaps Rick Jones who maintains netperf could enlighten us on some historic
numbers? he usually seems to be happy to prop up new netperf numbers :)


Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/