Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:27:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:26:52 -0500 Received: from mx04.nexgo.de ([151.189.8.80]:4619 "EHLO mx04.nexgo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:26:43 -0500 Message-ID: <3C54546C.0@arcor.de> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:26:36 +0100 From: Hartmut Holz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020116 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rik van Riel Cc: Linux kernel , Manfred Spraul Subject: Re: Uptime again? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rik van Riel wrote: > > The fact that lavrec crashes the machine while Xawtv works > suggests a device driver may be corrupting memory somewhere. > I got a debug patch from Manfred Spraul to debug slab.c. With this patch the machine ran for about 3 hours. No problem. I looked into slab.c and had an idea. What about just one CPU. So I built a new Kernel with just one CPU. Result: 1 CPU 1 Minute - 2 CPU 20 Minutes. I aspected a different result. In my opinion the whole thing has something to do with slab, SMP and threads. The machine (450Mhz PII, 448 MB, Intel L440GX Mainboard, Adaptec) it self is solid. It has run every 2.3.x and 2.4.x Kernel, Oracle and Sybase (only development). No problem. . Regards Hartmut - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/