Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752470AbYHLTYc (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:24:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751386AbYHLTYX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:24:23 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33696 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbYHLTYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:24:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:24:19 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] readdir mess Message-ID: <20080812192419.GU28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20080812062241.GQ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87ej4u9nf5.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20080812181057.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080812182240.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080812183745.GT28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080812183745.GT28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2102 Lines: 48 On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:37:45PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, how about that sequence: > > Patch 1: > Turn all filldir(...) < 0 into filldir() != 0 in ->readdir() instances, > no changes other than that. Everything should keep working as-is. > > Patch 2: > Make fillonedir() return 1 on the second call; make filldir() et.al. > return 1 instead of -EINVAL if we have ->previous != NULL. Again, > should be no breakage. aargh... Patch 2.5: Fix braindead instances of ->readdir() that return odd crap on success (e.g. coda_readdir() returning the count of filldir calls that had returned zero). > Patch 3: switch ->readdir() to your "return anything non-null we got from > callback". AFAICS, main callers will see no breakage, but in any case > we have few enough of those to adjust them as needed first. > > Patch 4: get rid of ->error and its ilk; adjust callers in obvious ways > (e.g. sys_gtedents() would bail out on negative from vfs_readdir() as > it does now and treat 0 and 1 in the same way - put_user() ? -EFAULT : much did we copy). Callers can be taken care one by one. Again, no breakage > and everything's bisectable. > > Patch 5 (maybe): > #define READDIR_MORE INT_MAX > Have ->readdir() instances that decide to stop once they'd done several > filldir calls return it if there's still more left. > Have vfs_readdir() loop calling ->readdir() as long as it gets READDIR_MORE. > Get rid of weird loops in callers. > > I'm not sure that the last one is needed - we might be better off just by > making the such instances loop themselves. In any case, loops in callers > (nfsd, etc.) are begging for trouble... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/