Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:09:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:09:21 -0500 Received: from zarjazz.demon.co.uk ([194.222.135.25]:44160 "EHLO zarjazz.demon.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <00b901c1a787$99dee5f0$0201010a@frodo> From: "Vincent Sweeney" To: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMP network performance Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 23:08:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Cox" To: "Vincent Sweeney" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:54 PM Subject: Re: PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMP network performance > > CPU0 states: 27.2% user, 62.4% system, 0.0% nice, 9.2% idle > > CPU1 states: 28.4% user, 62.3% system, 0.0% nice, 8.1% idle > > The important bit here is ^^^^^^^^ that one. Something is causing > horrendous lock contention it appears. Is the e100 driver optimised for SMP > yet ? Do you get better numbers if you use the eepro100 driver ? It's been a while since I tested with the eepro100 drivers (I switch to e100 about 2.4.4 due to some unrelated problems) so I cannot give a comparision just at present. I will test the eepro100 driver tomorrow on one of the servers and post results then. I will also try Andrew Morton's profiling tips on another box with the e100 driver. Vince. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/