Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754676AbYHLVz4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:55:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754535AbYHLVzm (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:55:42 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:43535 "EHLO gprs189-60.eurotel.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754517AbYHLVzl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:55:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:56:59 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mark Langsdorf , Greg KH Cc: joachim.deguara@amd.com, gregkh@ucw.cz, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01][retry 1] x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26 Message-ID: <20080812215659.GA12911@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200807181603.52332.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> <20080808220011.GA12156@ucw.cz> <200808121104.09288.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808121104.09288.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1695 Lines: 49 Hi! > > I think there's one-value-per-file rule in sysfs... > > > > I guess it is better to return -EOPNOTSUP (or something) instead of > > english text explaining that... > > > > No, really, what you created is impossible to parse -- /proc like > > nightmare. > > Okay, this is a simpler version that includes most of Ingo's > clean-ups and style changes. It only displays the two > cache index values. Is this acceptable? Not sure, lets ask greg. And it probably should have few lines in Documentation going with it, so we know new interface is added and how it looks. > +static ssize_t show_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf) > +{ > + int node = cpu_to_node(first_cpu(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map)); > + struct pci_dev *dev = get_k8_northbridge(node); > + ssize_t ret = 0; > + int i; > + > + if (!this_leaf->can_disable) > + return sprintf(buf, "-1"); This should return -ERRNO, right? > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > + unsigned int reg = 0; > + > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + i * 4, ®); > + > + ret += sprintf(buf, "%s %x\t", buf, reg); > + } > + ret += sprintf(buf,"%s\n", buf); So you print "buf" few times? Why? And you use both \t and \n as deliminer... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/