Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:22:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:22:26 -0500 Received: from sushi.toad.net ([162.33.130.105]:5274 "EHLO sushi.toad.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:22:11 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4.18-pre7 slow ... apm problem From: Thomas Hood To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 27 Jan 2002 22:22:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1012188133.2668.84.camel@thanatos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I wrote: > APM idling is done if apm_cpu_idle() is called, and then if > DELTA(current->times.tms_stime) > ------------------------------- > DELTA(jiffies) > is greater than the idle threshold of 0.95. Could that ratio be > affected by VMware? If so, how? Herm ... I think what you meant was that (a guest OS under) VMware might be telling the APM BIOS to idle the CPU. In that case, apm management should be shut off in either VMware or in the guest OS. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/