Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756177AbYHMNiT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:38:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752557AbYHMNiE (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:38:04 -0400 Received: from barnes.cubic.ch ([78.46.44.112]:46798 "EHLO barnes.cubic.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752282AbYHMNiB (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:38:01 -0400 Message-ID: <48A2E391.3080404@cubic.ch> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:37:21 +0200 From: Tim Tassonis Reply-To: timtas@cubic.ch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Krufky CC: Adrian Bunk , Pavel Machek , LKML Subject: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 References: <4896F56D.7080503@cubic.ch> <20080813125807.GC6995@ucw.cz> <20080813131839.GB26351@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <37219a840808130624p3d4dca0bja2935d6f34beaf7e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <37219a840808130624p3d4dca0bja2935d6f34beaf7e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "barnes.cubic.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Michael Krufky wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 02:58:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> On Mon 2008-08-04 14:26:21, Tim Tassonis wrote: >>>>> Why is reiser4 still not in a vanilla kernel for >>>>> testing. I have had >>>>> to apply the reiser4 patches from -mm kernels to >>>>> vanilla based >>>>> patchset for over a year now. Reiser4 works fine, what >>>>> will it take to >>>>> get it included in vanilla? Here is a patch to add >>>>> reiser4 to >>>>> 2.6.27-rc1: >>>>> >>>>> http://zen-sources.org/files/reiser4-for-2.6.27-rc1.patch >>>>> >>>>> -Ryan >>>> A good thing for a start would be to rename the whole >>>> thing to something else, for obvious reasons. >>> Whats wrong with reiser4 name? >>> >>> Pavel >>> (or am I feeding a troll?) >> Not wanting a new filesystem named after a convicted murderer is not >> a trollish suggestion. > > > Regardless of the murder conviction, I still believe that the guy > should get credit for his work. > > Reiserfs is a name that we all know of, regardless of how current we > are with the news (although you'd have to be PRETTY far behind if you > don't know about the crime) > > The current reiserfs filesystems aren't being renamed -- are they?? > > Does it really hurt to keep his name there? I think it should just go as-is. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX RBL: Envelope sender in bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2518 Lines: 64 Michael Krufky wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 02:58:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> On Mon 2008-08-04 14:26:21, Tim Tassonis wrote: >>>>> Why is reiser4 still not in a vanilla kernel for >>>>> testing. I have had >>>>> to apply the reiser4 patches from -mm kernels to >>>>> vanilla based >>>>> patchset for over a year now. Reiser4 works fine, what >>>>> will it take to >>>>> get it included in vanilla? Here is a patch to add >>>>> reiser4 to >>>>> 2.6.27-rc1: >>>>> >>>>> http://zen-sources.org/files/reiser4-for-2.6.27-rc1.patch >>>>> >>>>> -Ryan >>>> A good thing for a start would be to rename the whole >>>> thing to something else, for obvious reasons. >>> Whats wrong with reiser4 name? >>> >>> Pavel >>> (or am I feeding a troll?) >> Not wanting a new filesystem named after a convicted murderer is not >> a trollish suggestion. > > > Regardless of the murder conviction, I still believe that the guy > should get credit for his work. > > Reiserfs is a name that we all know of, regardless of how current we > are with the news (although you'd have to be PRETTY far behind if you > don't know about the crime) > > The current reiserfs filesystems aren't being renamed -- are they?? > > Does it really hurt to keep his name there? I think it should just go as-is. Well, in my opinion, there is little point in renaming reiserfs 3 now, as it is basically obsolete anyway and I suppose will disappear over time. As reiser4 is not yet in and would need some rework before inclusion anyway, the name could be fixed easily and I do think it would be a bit irritating to just completely ignore real-world issues. As for giving credit, I wasn't advocating in removing authorship attribution (that's what giving credit means to me), but calling the filesystem after himself was always a bit egocentric anyway. We don't have t'sofs, engelfs, molnarsched and stuff like that. And yes, I think Hans lost his right to decide over the name because of what he has done. That is no disrespect for his work, only for him as person in general, and I do strongly disrespect him as a person. Tim > > -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/