Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:52:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:51:50 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-003.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.3]:8065 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:51:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alex Davis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Don't use dbench for benchmarks Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:56:42 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020127043539.56216.qmail@web9203.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020127043539.56216.qmail@web9203.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 27, 2002 05:35 am, Alex Davis wrote: > I ran dbench on three different kernels: 2.4.17 w/ rmap12a, 2.4.18pre7, and > 2.4.18pre7 w/ rmap12a. 2.4.18pre7 had better throughput by a substantial > margin. The results are at http://www.dynamicbullet.com/rmap.html I must be having a bad day, I can only think of irritable things to post. Continuing that theme: please don't use dbench for benchmarks. At all. It's an unreliable indicator of anything in particular except perhaps stability. Please, use something else for your benchmarks. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/