Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:14:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:13:56 -0500 Received: from f127.pav2.hotmail.com ([64.4.37.127]:23825 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:13:44 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [156.153.255.134] From: "kumar M" To: kaos@ocs.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: exporting kernel symbols Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:13:38 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2002 13:13:38.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[99899660:01C1A7FD] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Keith, Thank you for the info. It was very informative. My problem is funny. On a freshly installed RedHat 7.1 machine with 2.4.2-2 kernel, a 'make modules' throws up errors such as : ---------------------------------------- /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux/module.h:173: nondigits in number and not hexadecimal /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux/module.h:173: parse error before `62dada05' /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux/module.h:173: `inter_module_register_R_ver_str' declared as function returning a function /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux/module.h:173: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ....................................................... So we do a 'make mrproper' and 'make menuconfig' and save and exit without any changes to configuration. Then we rebuild the kernel. make dep & make modules are done smoothly. Can you let us know why we should be doing make mrproper on a system freshly installed with redhat 7.1(2.4.2-2smp) Thanks ! Kumar >From: Keith Owens >To: "kumar M" >CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: exporting kernel symbols >Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:37:44 +1100 > >On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:16:10 +0000, >"kumar M" wrote: > >I am interested in knowing how mangling the name of symbols > >exported by the kernel to include the checksum of the information related >to > >that symbol is done, whenever MOD VERSIONS > >is used for building a module. Is there any documentation on the > >process of the checksum computation, and which portion of the linux > >sources I need to go through to understand this ? > >genksyms.c in the modutils source package[1]. The make dep process >pre-processes the C sources from each directory feeding the cpp output >into genksyms. genksyms calculates a hash for each exported symbol >based on its type, return values, parameters etc., recursively >descending parameter types as required. > >The resulting hashes are written out as #defines to change foo to >foo_Rxxxxxxxx. The defines are read back in when the real compile is >done, change references to foo into foo_Rxxxxxxxx. In the kernel the >original symbols are used but the export list includes the suffix. In >modules, external references include the suffix. > >In theory if a module refers to a symbol and the hashes for that symbol >match then the symbol has not changed its ABI and it is safe to load >the module, even if the kernel and module are from different versions. >In practice, modversions relies far too much on human processes and is >prone to false positives. The hashes can match when the ABI is >different because of human error[2], especially when people compile >drivers outside the kernel tree. Kernel and modutils 2.5 will have a >completely different method for checking ABI compatibility, if kbuild >2.5 ever gets in. > >[1] http://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4 >[2] http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/kbuild/kbuild-2.5-history.tar.bz2 > _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/