Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289241AbSA1QqO>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:46:14 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289239AbSA1QqB>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:46:01 -0500
Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:49306 "EHLO
	vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289231AbSA1Qpp>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:45:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:45:35 -0700
Message-Id: <200201281645.g0SGjZp02300@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd-many for 2.4.18-pre7 (uses devfs)
In-Reply-To: <20020128101035.B8894@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <200201280326.g0S3QTt27080@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
	<20020128101035.B8894@suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jens Axboe writes:
> On Sun, Jan 27 2002, Richard Gooch wrote:
> >   Hi, all. Appended is my sd-many patch. It supports up to 2080
> > SD's. This patch is against 2.4.18-pre7, and is essentially the same
> > as earlier versions of this patch, just compensating for kernel drift.
> 
> Could you please at least try to follow the style in sd? To me, this
> alone is reason enough why the patch should not be applied.

??? I *have* followed the style. Or at least I've tried to. Where did
I not?

				Regards,

					Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current:   rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/