Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760630AbYHOQZg (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:25:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755810AbYHOQZ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:25:27 -0400 Received: from mail.lang.hm ([64.81.33.126]:38354 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755126AbYHOQZ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:25:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:25:25 -0700 (PDT) From: david@lang.hm X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: "Press, Jonathan" cc: Peter Zijlstra , Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net, hch@infradead.org, andi@firstfloor.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Arjan van de Ven Subject: RE: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta. In-Reply-To: <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E855530304AE4BF6@USILMS12.ca.com> Message-ID: References: <1218645375.3540.71.camel@localhost.localdomain><20080813103951.1e3e5827@infradead.org><1218653864.3540.109.camel@localhost.localdomain><20080813143908.38796217@infradead.org><1218723133.3540.137.camel@localhost.localdomain><48A55574.9070508@aitel.hist.no> <1218796645.10800.242.camel@twins> <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E855530304AE4BF6@USILMS12.ca.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 36 On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Press, Jonathan wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: malware-list-bounces@dmesg.printk.net [mailto:malware-list- >> bounces@dmesg.printk.net] On Behalf Of Peter Zijlstra >> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 6:37 AM >> To: Helge Hafting >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; malware-list@lists.printk.net; > hch@infradead.org; >> andi@firstfloor.org; viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk; > alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; Arjan van >> de Ven >> Subject: Re: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta. >> >> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:07 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: >>> It seems to me that this "scan on file open" business is the >>> wrong way to do things - because it reduces performance. >>> >>> If you scan on file open, then your security sw is too late and >>> getting in the way. > > The problem is that you have to account for the cases where the malware > made it onto the system even if you were trying to catch it ahead of > time. For example: > > - Administrator turns off or reduces AV protection for some reason for > some period of time. It happens all the time. according to the threat model actions of the administrator do not matter. David Lang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/