Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754841AbYHPCxJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:53:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751913AbYHPCw4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:52:56 -0400 Received: from nfitmail.nfit.au.dk ([130.225.31.129]:14101 "EHLO smtp.nfit.au.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751967AbYHPCwz (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:52:55 -0400 To: Lukas Hejtmanek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: sysprof in 2.6.27 kernel References: <20080813083953.GF19333@ics.muni.cz> <20080814115620.GD4674@ics.muni.cz> From: Soeren Sandmann Date: 16 Aug 2008 04:52:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20080814115620.GD4674@ics.muni.cz> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 764 Lines: 14 Lukas Hejtmanek writes: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:23:16AM +0200, Soeren Sandmann wrote: > > It's somewhat rough still. If you try it out, I will be interested in > > any feedback you have. > > and another one. sysproc gui reads user addresses from the sysprof pipe with > null pointers. is this ok or is this a bug in sysprof kernel module? That is not ok, but it could happen if the process in question was not compiled with framepointers. Or it could be a bug in the kernel code. Soren -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/