Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:30:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:30:10 -0500 Received: from nrg.org ([216.101.165.106]:28725 "EHLO nrg.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:28:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:28:18 -0800 (PST) From: Nigel Gamble Reply-To: nigel@nrg.org To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: Alex Davis , Daniel Phillips , Subject: Re: Don't use dbench for benchmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > It sounds like you are describing the Aim Benchmark suite, which has > > been used for years to compare unix system performancem, and was > > recently released under the GPL by Caldera. > > > > See http://caldera.com/developers/community/contrib/aim.html > > That sounds good. Have you tried it? Does it seem to provide the > kind of data that will show the effect of various trade-offs? The last time I personally used it was over 10 years ago, but we got a lot of use out of it to test system performance after making kernel changes. Of course, we used other benchmarks and microbenchmarks too. Now that it has been GPL'd, I think it would be a useful addition to Linux benchmarking. Nigel Gamble nigel@nrg.org Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/