Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754540AbYHQQVM (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:21:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751671AbYHQQU5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:20:57 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:11092 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbYHQQU4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:20:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lYnVdDBtosJSl5Sm2+/5Ma9pzc7tEsQncOxmUO9+jBjmFiGoZkvosUOsDkBJzOXlAc Q/WVuyF/3lfEmoM3F/nf/u3FCAWgtXoyXbhULM7IhzrLglQAymkPmDgndORqS7o6/mCX vBoKOOvopkSa9IXVqzTz8SpF8IEA+PT9bqcaI= Message-ID: <1ba2fa240808170920r67e11567h2da8b396b18729dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:20:54 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch Cc: "Mirco Tischler" , "Leonid Podolny" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, IvDoorn@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48A5EC02.4070303@gmail.com> <20080817035921.4d35ae0e@mtlp.12thdimension> <1ba2fa240808170004p63b76db1l1fdfb1cf1cb41636@mail.gmail.com> <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 964 Lines: 25 On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and >> are apparently wrong. > > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even > if you don't know how to fix them)? > 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be acked by Yi or me. I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/