Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756087AbYHQRcs (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752908AbYHQRcj (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:39 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3388 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752672AbYHQRci (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:07:14 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Tomas Winkler Cc: Mirco Tischler , Leonid Podolny , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, IvDoorn@gmail.com Subject: Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch Message-ID: <20080817170714.GA29938@tuxdriver.com> References: <48A5EC02.4070303@gmail.com> <20080817035921.4d35ae0e@mtlp.12thdimension> <1ba2fa240808170004p63b76db1l1fdfb1cf1cb41636@mail.gmail.com> <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> <1ba2fa240808170920r67e11567h2da8b396b18729dd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240808170920r67e11567h2da8b396b18729dd@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 35 On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close > >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and > >> are apparently wrong. > > > > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even > > if you don't know how to fix them)? > > > > 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 > This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though > they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be > acked by Yi or me. And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie... > I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch. Thanks! John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/