Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:26:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:26:37 -0500 Received: from NEVYN.RES.CMU.EDU ([128.2.145.6]:45954 "EHLO nevyn.them.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:26:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:26:20 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alan Cox Cc: Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH?] Crash in 2.4.17/ptrace Message-ID: <20020128172620.A11522@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <001401c1a844$ae7c51b0$010411ac@local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:05:31PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > For framebuffers addresses, there is no page structure, and then the > > page reference count updates read/write to random memory. > > If it is a physical pci bus object why do we need to refcount it, surely > "no page" is ok. Its just up to the driver not to do anything stupid and > the core code to honour the pci/pci transfer quirks (or when faced with > a hard one just say "no") So, is there a clear interface by which access_process_vm ought to be able to get at the mapped framebuffer, or should get_user_pages just punt off it? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/