Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752904AbYHRNxo (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:53:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752494AbYHRNxe (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:53:34 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:17106 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbYHRNxd (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:53:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released From: Chris Mason To: Szabolcs Szakacsits Cc: linux-btrfs , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel In-Reply-To: References: <1217962876.15342.33.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1218100464.8625.9.camel@twins> <1218105597.15342.189.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <877ias66v4.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1218221293.15342.263.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1218747656.15342.439.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080814211756.GC13814@one.firstfloor.org> <1218763554.15342.460.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080815013934.GE19125@one.firstfloor.org> <1218805256.15342.484.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:52:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1219067529.2137.1.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1021 Lines: 31 On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:26 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > > > Ext3 and XFS score somewhere between 10-15MB/s on the same test... > > Interesting (and cool animations). > > We tried compilebench (-i 30 -r 0) just for fun using kernel 2.6.26, > freshly formatted partition, with defaults. Results: > > MB/s Runtime (s) > ----- ----------- > ext3 13.24 877 > btrfs 12.33 793 Thanks for running things. The code in the btrfs-unstable tree has all my performance fixes. You'll need it to get good results. Also, the MB/s number doesn't include the time to run sync at the end, which is probably why the runtime for btrfs is shorter but MB/s is lower. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/