Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754784AbYHROpD (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:45:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755180AbYHROou (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:44:50 -0400 Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.171]:18452 "EHLO mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754856AbYHROos (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:44:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFANsmqUjCTsYx/2dsb2JhbACBYrI6gVg From: Laurent Pinchart Organization: CSE Semaphore To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: make gpio_to_chip() public Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:44:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell , Li Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi References: <20080808161717.GA19095@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <200808181558.50182.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080818143343.GA30812@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080818143343.GA30812@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1295929.rOlv2Qjvov"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200808181644.45480.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3959 Lines: 108 --nextPart1295929.rOlv2Qjvov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 18 August 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > [...] > > > Not exactly. But you can do this way, if you need to preserve > > > a direction. What I did is a bit different though. > > >=20 > > > qe_gpio_set_dedicated() actually just restores a mode that > > > firmware had set up, including direction (since direction could > > > be a part of dedicated configuration). > > >=20 > > > That is, upon GPIO controller registration, we save all registers, > > > then driver can set up a pin to a GPIO mode via standard API, and > > > then it can _revert_ a pin to a dedicated function via > > > qe_gpio_set_dedicated() call. Dedicated function is specified by > > > the firmware (or board file), we're just restoring it. > >=20 > > The semantic of the set_dedicated() operation needs to be clearly > > defined then. >=20 > It is. We set up a dedicated function that firmware (or board file) > has configured. A comment in the source would help. > > I can live with this behaviour, but it might not be > > acceptable for everybody. >=20 > For example? >=20 > > Your patch requires the firmware to set a pin in dedicated mode at > > bootup in order to be used later in dedicated mode. >=20 > Yes. On a PowerPC this is always true: firmware should set up PIO > config. Linux' board file could fixup the firmware though. That's not what I meant. What if the hardware requires to pin to be configu= red in GPIO mode with a fixed value until the SOC-specific driver that will= drive the GPIO is loaded ? That's not possible with your API. Until a SOC peripheral is initialized by its associated Linux driver, the b= ehaviour of a GPIO pin in dedicated mode will be undefined. The firmware/bo= ard code will probably want to set the pin as a GPIO output with a fixed va= lue until the driver initializes the hardware. > Another option would be to add some argument to the set_dedicated > call, thus the software could specify arbitrary dedicated > function (thus no need to save/restore anything). But this would > be SOC-model specific, thus no driver can use this argument anyway. Drivers that require dedicated mode are SOC-specific anyway. > > If, for some > > reason (driver not loaded, ...), no GPIO user shows up for that > > pin, it will stay configured in dedicated mode. >=20 > Yes. >=20 > > It might be better to set the PAR bit unconditionally in >=20 > Why it might be better? Because, as explained a few lines down, the board initialization code will = be able to configure a pin in a known state (PAR not set) at boot time unti= l a driver requests the pin to be switched to dedicated mode. > That way you may set up wrong _GPIO_=20 > mode, because you didn't set PAR bit (when PAR bit set > DIR/ODR/DAT bits are losing their meanings). >=20 > > qe_gpio_set_dedicated() instead of restoring its value. That way > > the board initialization code could just set the DIR, DAT and ODR > > bits for dedicated mode but still configure the pin in GPIO mode. =2D-=20 Laurent Pinchart CSE Semaphore Belgium Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A B-1410 Waterloo Belgium T +32 (2) 387 42 59 =46 +32 (2) 387 42 75 --nextPart1295929.rOlv2Qjvov Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkipit0ACgkQ8y9gWxC9vpe+QQCfWz6zaXaM0LxM9zcMnSOJKSx/ 2toAnAiBcyCkeicsC6KM84XmvGhLGMqP =mHXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1295929.rOlv2Qjvov-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/