Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754599AbYHRRhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:37:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752360AbYHRRhc (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:37:32 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:42133 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586AbYHRRhb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:37:31 -0400 Message-ID: <48A9B228.3040504@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:24 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , David Fries , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix i486 suspend to disk CR4 oops References: <20080818040340.GB17528@spacedout.fries.net> <20080818064120.GA28941@elte.hu> <20080818152440.GA26134@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20080818152440.GA26134@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 561 Lines: 18 Dave Jones wrote: > > Is this part really necessary ? > > Why would a 486 be in EFI code? > Necessary, almost certainly not, but (a) it doesn't hurt anything, (b) it's good to be consistent and (c) it might still be useful to virtualizers. EFI is an abomination no matter how you look at it, of course. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/