Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:53:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:53:24 -0500 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:57982 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:53:15 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: "Jeff V. Merkey" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Nov 2000 16:36:55 PDT." <20001126163655.A1637@vger.timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:23:08 +1100 Message-ID: <1604.975280988@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 16:36:55 -0700, "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: >Keith, > >Please consider the attached patch for inclusion in all future versions >of the modutils depmod program for compatiblity with RedHat and >RedHat derived Linux distributions. I have a big problem with Redhat. They make incompatible changes to utilities, do not feed patches back to maintainers then expect the rest of the world to follow their lead. The -i and -m flags to modutils are not the only example, I recently found IA64 and Sparc patches they had added to modutils code and not bothered to tell me. Other distributors are much better about sending me patches, Debian and SuSe in particular do the right thing. Since "-F System.map" in modutils is equivalent to "-m System.map -i" and works on all distributions, not just Redhat, the "-m -i" patch is unnecessary. Consider this my protest against bad habits by distributors, they created the mess with their lack of communication and they have to fix it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/