Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:11:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:11:07 -0500 Received: from mail108.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.48]:11871 "EHLO imf08bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:10:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Rik van Riel's vm-rmap From: Louis Garcia To: Robert Love Cc: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1012263182.817.9.camel@phantasy> In-Reply-To: <1012262826.1634.1.camel@tiger> <1012263182.817.9.camel@phantasy> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 (1.0.1-2) Date: 28 Jan 2002 19:14:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1012263259.1634.3.camel@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Should I do the rmap patch first? --Louis On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 19:12, Robert Love wrote: > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 19:07, Louis Garcia wrote: > > Does this patch work well with Andrew's low-latency patch? > > There will be failed hunks in the VM code (specifically vmscan.c), but > you can safely ignore them. So, yes, it works. > > Robert Love > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/