Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:14:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:14:00 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:17934 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:13:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Rik van Riel's vm-rmap From: Robert Love To: Louis Garcia Cc: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1012263259.1634.3.camel@tiger> In-Reply-To: <1012262826.1634.1.camel@tiger> <1012263182.817.9.camel@phantasy> <1012263259.1634.3.camel@tiger> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 28 Jan 2002 19:19:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1012263560.817.11.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 19:14, Louis Garcia wrote: > Should I do the rmap patch first? Yes, if Andrew's low-latency patch fails you just lose the scheduling points in vmscan.c (big deal). If rmap half applies... ouch. So apply rmap first. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/