Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:31:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:30:50 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:33271 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:30:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:30:37 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Hans Reiser cc: Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , Josh MacDonald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure In-Reply-To: <3C55E9E3.50207@namesys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hans Reiser wrote: > This fails to recover an object (e.g. dcache entry) which is used once, > and then spends a year in cache on the same page as an object which is > hot all the time. This means that the hot set of objects becomes > diffused over an order of magnitude more pages than if garbage > collection squeezes them all together. That makes for very poor caching. Any GC that is going to move active dentries around is out of question. It would need a locking of such strength that you would be the first to cry bloody murder - about 5 seconds after you look at the scalability benchmarks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/