Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:53:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:53:42 -0500 Received: from mail120.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.80]:11899 "EHLO imf20bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:53:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Rik van Riel's vm-rmap From: Louis Garcia To: Rik van Riel Cc: Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 (1.0.1-2) Date: 28 Jan 2002 19:56:56 -0500 Message-Id: <1012265817.4386.2.camel@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ok, has anyone ported the latest patch to 2.4.18-pre7 yet?? --Louis On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 19:15, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 28 Jan 2002, Louis Garcia wrote: > > > Should I do the rmap patch first? > > Yes. > > After that you can patch the low latency patch, > which will give you a reject on vmscan.c > > This doesn't matter because: > 1) each part of the low latency patch is independant > 2) -rmap already has low latency code in vmscan.c > > kind regards, > > Rik > -- > "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" > -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document > > http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/