Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288325AbSA2Bfo>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:35:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288308AbSA2Bfe>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:35:34 -0500
Received: from adsl-187-220.38-151.net24.it ([151.38.220.187]:64012 "EHLO
	karis.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S288158AbSA2BfU>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:35:20 -0500
Message-Id: <200201290137.g0T1bwB24120@karis.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 02:37:57 +0100
From: Francesco Munda <syylk@libero.it>
To: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
In-Reply-To: <200201282213.g0SMDcU25653@snark.thyrsus.com>
In-Reply-To: <200201282213.g0SMDcU25653@snark.thyrsus.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:10:56 -0500
Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org> wrote:

> Patch Penguin Proposal.
> 
> [...]

You mean some sort of proxy/two-tier development? A "commit/rollback"
transaction model on the kernel itself?

I deeply agree with you, especially in keeping "many eyes" to look at the
same kernel tree, and not chosing one of the many subtrees; as added bonus,
this stuff is buzzword compliant! What we can ask more? :)

Now, Linus' call to accept _your_ patch. Fingers crossed already.

-- FM
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/