Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753425AbYHSH1n (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:27:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751952AbYHSH1e (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:27:34 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40044 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751602AbYHSH1d (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:27:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:27:15 +0100 From: Russell King To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] arm: use the new byteorder headers Message-ID: <20080819072715.GB30521@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1219106875.17033.55.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1219106875.17033.55.camel@brick> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 19 On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:47:55PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/byteorder.h | 25 +++++++++++-------------- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) You keep posting this, and it's the only bit I see, but... what about the other bits that it depends on, which without them, it's impossible to test this patch with? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/