Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:47:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:47:35 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([12.107.208.154]:12555 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:47:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3C560D33.5020608@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:47:15 -0500 From: Doug Ledford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neale Banks CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] i810 driver update. In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neale Banks wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Doug Ledford wrote: > > [...] > >>>Are the fixes in this going to be applicable to 2.2 also (FWIW, 2.2's >>>i810_audio #defines ``DRIVER_VERSION "0.17"'')? >>> >> >>I'm sure the fixes are relevant. How well they may integrate into 2.2 is >>another question :-/ >> > > Indeed ;-) Alan? > [...] > >>The best I can do it to make a diff between the 0.17 driver version I have >>here and the 0.21 driver version. Maybe that incremental diff will apply to >>the 2.2 kernel's i810_audio.c and bring it up to date without any specific >>back port needed. It's attached. >> > > Thanks anyway, but it doesn't look too hopeful (patch complaints > appended). I suspect your "0.17" and 2.2's "0.17" may not be the same > thing (in 2.2.21pre2 i810_audio.c is 51877 bytes and "sum (GNU textutils) > 2.0" reports "44467 51" > > Regards, > Neale. > > $ patch --dry-run < 2.2-i810.patch > patching file `i810_audio.c.17' > Hunk #1 succeeded at 181 (offset -25 lines). > Hunk #2 FAILED at 576. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 653. > Hunk #4 FAILED at 1107. > Hunk #5 FAILED at 1117. > Hunk #6 FAILED at 1138. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 1169. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 1127 with fuzz 1 (offset -248 lines). > Hunk #9 FAILED at 1278. > Hunk #10 FAILED at 1492. > Hunk #11 FAILED at 2175. > Hunk #12 FAILED at 2877. > 10 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to i810_audio.c.17.rej > > Yeah, there's a vast difference there. I would guess that the difference is the presence of S/PDIF support in the 2.4+ .17 driver version and none in the 2.2 version. Email me the whole 0.17 file you have there (off-list) and I'll see about integrating the changes. -- Doug Ledford http://people.redhat.com/dledford Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before e-mailing me about problems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/