Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755840AbYHSJvT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:51:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753306AbYHSJvE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:51:04 -0400 Received: from cluster-g.mailcontrol.com ([208.87.233.190]:50351 "EHLO cluster-g.mailcontrol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752889AbYHSJvD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:51:03 -0400 Message-ID: <48AA9757.3090002@csr.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:15 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Kernel development list , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, "Brandeburg, Jesse" Subject: Re: e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM References: <489C2457.5030104@csr.com> <20080818224011.6fad74dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080818224011.6fad74dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Aug 2008 09:50:15.0805 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB59FAD0:01C901E0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1437 Lines: 36 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:47:51 +0100 David Vrabel wrote: > >> 2.6.27-rc1 kernels appear to corrupt the EEPROM/NVM of the 8086:294c >> ethernet device (ICH9 I think). After hacking the driver to ignore the >> bad CRC and MAC address I could view the EEPROM with ethtool and it was >> all 0xff. >> >> Testing EEPROM reads and writes with ethtool appeared to work but after >> a reboot of the system the ethernet device (see lspci -v output) was no >> longer present. Could invalid EEPROM contents with a valid CRC (as >> would be the case after my read/write tests) result in the device >> failing to enumerate on the PCIe bus? FYI, Jesse Brandeburg replied off-list and said that a corrupt EEPROM with a valid CRC can result in the device failing to enumerate. > Is this still happening in Linus's current tree? I don't know, and I'm reluctant to try until I have a reliable way to restore an erased EEPROM. > Was 2.6.26 OK? 2.6.26 was fine. David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/