Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755518AbYHSNTb (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:19:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753932AbYHSNTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:19:23 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45203 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753391AbYHSNTW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:19:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:18:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: Vegard Nossum , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Robert Richter , Philippe Elie , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness Message-ID: <20080819131847.GA31605@elte.hu> References: <19f34abd0808181332k3c02496auabd04e927bb7cab5@mail.gmail.com> <48AA1E42.6070802@linux.intel.com> <19f34abd0808190012r4418cc4egf9bc25a52056af41@mail.gmail.com> <20080819094905.GA20590@elte.hu> <48AAB8B6.3020802@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48AAB8B6.3020802@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1635 Lines: 42 * Andi Kleen wrote: >> Andi, another issue: your patch had 5 spurious whitespace errors. >> This is a reoccuring, many years pattern of behavior from you and you >> need to fix your workflow to send less sloppy patches. > > Yes I forgot you define patch cleanness based on white space. > > Seriously, It's actually new -- i did this one in git directly instead > of quilt and git-commit doesn't seem to know how to drop them. In my > older quilt workflow they were always automatically dropped since many > years. Both emacs and vim add them and I don't plan to switch editors, > sorry. Thousands of other kernel developers get it right and manage to submit clean patches, so i think you are not trying very hard to actually solve this problem - and your flippant and obtrusive answers do not make it very easy to work with you as a contributor. >> I fixed up the problems of this patch, no need to resend. > > I hope you fixed the typos in the commit log too (it really was just a > RFC test patch) You've put your signoff in there and Vegard has tested it. The general principle on lkml is that patches can be marked as do-not-apply-yet by adding something like this: Not-Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen or by not adding a SOB line at all. In that case i either ask people for the SOB or apply them at my own risk. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/