Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755046AbYHSOTS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:19:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752697AbYHSOTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.201]:52757 "EHLO smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbYHSOTE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:19:04 -0400 Message-ID: <48AAD680.7020508@keyaccess.nl> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:19:44 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Dave Airlie , Shaohua Li , Yinghai Lu , Andreas Herrmann , Arjan van de Ven , dri-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel , Suresh Siddha , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: AGP and PAT (induced?) problem (on AMD family 6) References: <48972EA8.8040001@keyaccess.nl> <20080815142218.GC12954@elte.hu> <48A59FAC.7050605@keyaccess.nl> <48AA9C3B.5030309@keyaccess.nl> <20080819102633.GE6722@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080819102633.GE6722@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2143 Lines: 54 On 19-08-08 12:26, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rene Herman wrote: > >> On 15-08-08 17:24, Rene Herman wrote: >> >>> On 15-08-08 16:22, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>>> (more people Cc:-ed) >>> Thank you. Additional information at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/6/449 >>> >>>> agreed - +12 seconds wait suggest some rather fundamental breakage. >>>> Did we go back to uncached for some critical display area that makes >>>> X start up (shut down) that slowly? Did we mark the BIOS uncacheable >>>> perhaps, causing X to execute BIOS code very slowly? >>> Quite a lot "uncached-minus" in those lists. I am desperately trying to >>> avoid a clue about mostly anything graphics related so, "I dunno". >>> >>> I haven't just disabled PAT yet (although I was about to just do so) >>> and am available for testing. >> >> >> Additional observation with respect to first,next shutdown: >> >> With Option "AGPSize" "64", and booted with "nopat", X startup (from >> startx to functional desktop) is approximately 5 seconds, >> shutdown is 1 second as calibration times. >> >> Booted without "nopat", X startup seems to alternate between 10+ and >> 16+ seconds and for shutdown -- the first shutdown after boot takes >> some 14 seconds total, subsequent shutdowns settle at around 5 >> seconds. > > would it be possible to start up and shut down X in the slow case via > strace, by doing something like this: > > strace -f -ttt -TTT -o trace.log startx > > and see which system calls (or other activities) took suspiciously long? It wouldn't it seems. Root X (needed for the strace) works fine but started this way hangs indefinitely. I believe the 14 seconds for first shutdown to 5 later might be telling. Sounds like something might have fixed up uncached entries. I'd really like a reply from the AGP or PAT side right about now. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/