Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756688AbYHSR6L (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:58:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753506AbYHSR54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:57:56 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.190]:45762 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753418AbYHSR5z (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:57:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=cBpz22HGQbxfM0OpDs0z8D2yUTv5yd3sL+qnGdVNtwFVIKj2eRMEb0tOx4vIPhtsid oONOFU601TLzcUqb27OuLi5y5Kh9TewjPMc/mIZlFqIP6ifDpL7iiP83eHrFQosl1LNT kv3c2zi1DWiUnR0LlORjvqmPoN7RDM5qEND24= Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:54:40 +0300 From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mpm@selenic.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, tzanussi@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings" Message-ID: <20080819175440.GA5435@localhost> References: <1219167807-5407-1-git-send-email-eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 33 On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:51:32AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote: > > > This reverts commit 79cf3d5e207243eecb1c4331c569e17700fa08fa. > > > > The reverted commit, while it fixed printk format warnings, it resulted in > > marker-probe format mismatches. Another approach should be used to fix > > these warnings. > > Such as what? > > Can marker probes be fixed instead? > > After seeing & fixing lots of various warnings in the last few days, > I'm thinking that people don't look at/heed warnings nowadays. Sad. > Maybe there are just so many that they are lost in the noise. Hi, Check the next patch in the series, it provides the alternate fix. I favor this approach more because it involves fewer changes and we don't have to use things like "%zu" (which make data type size less apparent). Cheers, Eduard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/