Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757209AbYHSUsV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:48:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753953AbYHSUsE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:48:04 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:39968 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753410AbYHSUsD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:48:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:47:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Miller cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking In-Reply-To: <20080819.131454.223684377.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20080819.041706.261399060.davem@davemloft.net> <20080819.131454.223684377.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1750 Lines: 42 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, David Miller wrote: > > The BT bits were the only part I really considered borderline, > and I was going to push back on Marcel. I really don't see the e1000 and netxen updates as being critical either. Sure, they look like driver improvement, but "improvement" is not what the -rc3+ series is about. Same goes for all the loopback changes. They look like cleanups or feature enables. IOW, it all looks like good commits, but quite a _lot_ of that queue looks like good commits that should happen during the merge window, not during the stabilization phase. And this is by no means unique to _this_ pull request. It's been a very clear pattern for a long time now. The networking area tends to be one of the absolutely *most* active ones during the post-rc1 phase. [ Yeah, in all fairness some architectures also do that, but at least I feel like I _really_ don't need to care when I get a diffstat that only touches arch/sh/* or something like that. ] > But to be honest, I haven't seen bluetooth updates from him > for such a long time I felt that being strict here would just > exacerbate the problem. I pointed out the BT ones as standing out (they were larger than some of the other patches too), but I really don't think this was in any way limited to BT in any shape, form or color. Quite frankly, looking through the thing, my gut feel is that about _half_ the commits over-all should probably have been in the queue for the next release. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/