Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759199AbYHSVrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:47:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753880AbYHSVrJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:47:09 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38982 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752725AbYHSVrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:47:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:46:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Miller cc: rjw@sisk.pl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking In-Reply-To: <20080819.143556.245692295.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20080819.140458.236030589.davem@davemloft.net> <200808192315.48718.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080819.143556.245692295.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1854 Lines: 43 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, David Miller wrote: > > That change was made under the pretext that it was tested heavily and > that if we hit any problem whatsoever with it that we couldn't fix > quickly it would be reverted. David, I will say this one more time: - as long as you concentrate on individual commits, you're missing the big picture. you can _always_ make excuses for individual commits. That's not my point. Or rather, it actually verry much _is_ my point. If you have the mindset that you're looking for excuses why any individual commit is ok to merge, then you don't end up with a coupld of individual commits any more: you end up with a LOT OF CHURN. It's not the individual commits. You're looking at the individual trees, and you're missing the forest. The problem isn't the individual trees. The problem is that there's a metric sh*tload of individual trees, what we in the tree industry call a 'forest'. You're not seeing it. And btw, don't get me wrong - you're not the only problem spot. During the -rc's leading up to 2.6.26, drivers/merdia was actually a _bigger_ problem. I happen to care less about that (the same way I care less about some odd-ball architectures), but I have to admit that drivers/media was a total disaster last time around. So if it makes you feel any better, others have been even worse. But this networking problem ha been going on for quite a while. So the problem here really is that you seem overly eager to make excuses for individual patches. And if they _stayed_ "individual" it would all be good. But they don't seem to. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/