Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:22:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:22:15 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:65294 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:22:04 -0500 Message-Id: <200201290940.g0T9etE27352@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Vlasenko Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: Borsenkow Andrej Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERN_INFO for devfs Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:40:57 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <000001c1a896$64e5ff40$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> In-Reply-To: <000001c1a896$64e5ff40$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29 January 2002 05:27, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > I changed "none" to "devfs" in do_mount("none", "/dev", "devfs", 0, > > ""): > > "none is busy" is misleading at umount time :-) > > File systems that do not have real devices behind them have "none" as > device. Please do not change it - it was correct. Having it later in > /proc/mounts may confuse some user-level tools. If you want to fix it - > fix umount to report something more sensible if device == none. Why do you think they _have to_ have "none"? Is it POSIXized or otherwise standardized? Where can I RTFM? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/