Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 06:05:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 06:05:10 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:49158 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 06:04:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:04:42 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: John Weber Cc: Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: <3C5600A6.3080605@nyc.rr.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, John Weber wrote: > I would be happy to serve as patch penguin, as I plan on collecting all > patches anyway in my new duties as maintainer of www.linuxhq.com. > we have the hardware/network capacity to serve as a limitless queue of > waiting patches for Linus. Please don't just accumulate stuff. It would be useful to know which of the patches still applies against the most recent 2.2, 2.4 or 2.5 kernel, so each patch gets some status fields: 1) applies against 2.2 2) applies against 2.4 3) applies against 2.5 4) was applied to 2.2 5) was applied to 2.4 6) was applied to 2.5 7) bitrotted patch, no longer applies and wasn't applied ... moved to 'old' queue kind regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/