Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752544AbYHTJbV (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:31:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750834AbYHTJbF (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:31:05 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.238]:63764 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbYHTJbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:31:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Wj9QVIxPHkr7wxP7D5EMWJYx34ZeZrhQKvg45qyN0Ikzp26SxW2zie0+FyJw71ubvs Km9ffMUZ5qxXaDIKqXt7byicev/2LyhEMFknraTQpzopddTq0c+D1klP/gLHR+gtAk28 fiw0uD5wECvCpK1CWl3GgTccJWbYJx0/QQlCM= Message-ID: <86802c440808200231h27ab9121ofe68c86c2a80535e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:31:03 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Ingo Molnar" , "Vivek Goyal" Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression Cc: "Bill Fink" , "David Witbrodt" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" , netdev In-Reply-To: <20080820091513.GA23865@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <109483.89278.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <86802c440808192221s3ada5443qc3b9d8e26f252d03@mail.gmail.com> <20080820035130.38426b00.billfink@mindspring.com> <86802c440808200102n6487ae17ud790991b8ea30d16@mail.gmail.com> <20080820091513.GA23865@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1011 Lines: 31 On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > This is true if he reverted just the 3def3d6d... commit, but if he >> > also reverts the similar, and immediately following, 1e934dda... >> > commit, then his 2.6.26 kernel runs fine. >> >> interesting, >> >> David, can you try only comment out >> >> late_initcall(lapic_insert_resource); > > i.e. the patch below? > > what's your theory, what could be the reason for David's lockups? could be insert_resource related. 1. revert patch that change back insert_resource doesn't work 2. insert_resource for lapic address moved to late after .... need to add debug printout for insert_resource/request_resource to make sure thing going well YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/