Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757964AbYHTOLR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:11:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751144AbYHTOLB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:11:01 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40351 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751101AbYHTOLA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:11:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] byteorder: add new headers for make headers-install From: David Woodhouse To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML In-Reply-To: <1219091880.23637.5.camel@brick> References: <1219091880.23637.5.camel@brick> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:10:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1219241454.2988.155.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 794 Lines: 20 On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:38 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison > --- > Andrew, two fixes before the arches start moving over. We don't expose cpu_to_le32() et al., do we? Only __cpu_to_le32() and similar? Which exported headers use these -- and are they actually using the __ versions? If not, they're not going to work anyway, are they? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/