Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:02:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:00:58 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:17427 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:00:37 -0500 Message-Id: <200201291140.g0TBecE28017@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Vlasenko Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: Borsenkow Andrej , Richard Gooch Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERN_INFO for devfs Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:40:39 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <000701c1a8b1$2f493850$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> In-Reply-To: <000701c1a8b1$2f493850$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Why do you think they _have to_ have "none"? Is it POSIXized or > > otherwise standardized? Where can I RTFM? > > I do not think they have to. They just are :-) > > fs/namespace.c:show_vfsmnt() > > ... > mangle(m, mnt->mnt_devname ? mnt->mnt_devname : "none"); > > > I find this convention quite useful. It allows any program to easily > skip virtual filesystems. Using something like /dev or devfs in this > case does not add any bit of useful information but possibly adds to > confusion. Maybe you're right. It's up to maintainer to decide. Richard, do you need updated patch without "none" -> "devfs"? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/