Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:31:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:31:04 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:10515 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:31:00 -0500 Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin To: hch@ns.caldera.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:43:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: dalecki@evision-ventures.com (Martin Dalecki), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, axboe@suse.de In-Reply-To: <200201291313.g0TDDd716906@ns.caldera.de> from "Christoph Hellwig" at Jan 29, 2002 02:13:39 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I still don't think maintainig this array is worth just for hfs > readahead, so the below patch disables it and gets rid of read_ahead. > > Jens, could you check the patch and include it in your next batch of > block-layer changes for Linus? What would be significantly more useful would be to make it actually work. Lots of drivers benefit from control over readahead sizes - both the stunningly slow low end stuff and the high end raid cards that often want to get hit by very large I/O requests (eg 128K for the ami megaraid) Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/